Scanner Tales: Protecting the scanners from transmitters

N9JIG

Sheriff
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
6,188
Location
Far NW Valley
If you are reading this then you are probably a scanner listener. If you are not reading this then just move along. Many of you are also hams, GMRS operators or a user of some other two-way radio in proximity to your scanners. I am or have been all 3 over the years and almost always have a two-way radio (or 3 or 4) installed along with my scanners.

While this is all well and good, there are occasionally issues. The first is the transmitter feeding back into the scanner, either on the same frequency or a different one. Many of us program our scanner for many of the same frequencies we might transmit on, when I was still on the police department, I had all our freqs in the scanner all the time. I just had to remember to lock out that bank when I was working. Same for my ham and GMRS channels. I always have GMRS/FRS/MURS channels scanning and have to remember to turn off that radio or bank when active. While I am a ham I just am not quite as active there and rarely have ham freqs in the scanner, but when I do, I have to lock out those channels or banks.

One thing you may recall on a recent Tale I wrote is that I use CloseCall ALL the time. When I transmit the CloseCall scanner will of course open on that channel or some seemingly random frequency. That random frequency is not really that random; it is mathematically related somehow to the actual frequency, the scanner is so overloaded that it gets confused and hits on something weird. If I cared enough, I am pretty sure I could figure out the mathematical relationship between the actual and displayed frequencies but even I am not that anal.

The more serious issue however is the possible damage to the scanner or the multicoupler that it may be connected to. I use Stridsberg multicouplers in my home shack, I have 4 of the 8-port MCA208M active multicouplers, two of which are in current use and the other two are stored for future use. I also have a couple other active and passive units available as needed. I used to use a 4-port in the car but have added antennas or reduced the number of radios used so each has its own dedicated antenna.

Several times I have had the multicoupler “pop” and stop passing signals. As I understand from discussions with the guys at Stridsberg is that there is a SMD diode that protects the input of the multicoupler from damage caused by nearby transmitters. The problem is that this diode is not user replaceable. Over the years I have had to send a few back for repairs, if the device is still under warranty, they have fixed them for free, otherwise the repairs have been reasonably priced.

A year or two ago 3 of my 8-port multicouplers had gone bad. As they failed, I replaced it with a working unit until I was down to my last working one. I then sent all 3 failed units in for repair. One was still in warranty but the other two were well out of warranty. They fixed all 3 but only charged me for 2 and I got them back in a couple weeks and they all work great. They actually just replaced the oldest unit, it was of an older design, but they only charged me the repair rate to replace it.

I have also had a couple scanners themselves go deaf from overload by my dual bander in the car, most recently a BCD536HP. It was working great until one day I noticed it was not hearing anything. Swapping out the antenna did nothing, so I deduced that the radio was at fault. I opened it up and could not see any evidence of a cold solder joint or damaged BNC connector so sent it to Uniden for repair. The same radio had a display issue unrelated to this, so I had them fix both issues. It cost about $100 including shipping but was well worth the cost, this 536 works as well now as it did when new.

After spending a few hundred dollars fixing radios and multicouplers I looked into ways to avoid this. After looking at a couple alternatives I turned back to my go-to guys at Stridsberg and bought 3 LIM-01WB RF Power Limiters. These handy little devices go between the antenna and radio or multicoupler and protect them from nearby transmitters and electrostatic discharge (ESD) such as caused by wind or lightning. They mention in the documentation that they are not intended for direct lightning hits but can protect from ESD from hits that are nearby.

I put one each on the scanners in the car (BCD536HP’s) and one on the multicoupler at my home shack. At the time I only had one, so I didn’t need to buy any more but of course I have to change things around on a regular basis, so I have another two on order. Unfortunately, they are out of stock until mid-July due to parts availability so I will have to be patient. I suppose I could get a model from a different manufacturer, but I like Stridsberg’s products, and the customer service has gotten better recently. These aren’t really cheap, I paid $130 each for them but I suspect that I would make that up in repairs that I won’t have to make and some peace of mind.

Since I like Stridsberg’s products I will patiently await the two additional RF Limiters I have on order. I really only need one right now but one never knows so I bought two just in case.

As an aside here: After John Stridsberg (Founder of Stridsberg Engineering) passed away a few years ago his family took over the business. It was a pretty rough time I presume, and things got a bit sideways. Phone calls and emails went unanswered, and orders were delayed. Recently however they seemed to improve and, while not perfect, they have returned calls and provided honest answers to my inquiries. I had talked to John many times over the years, and he did some custom work for me a couple times. He was a good guy for sure!

Back to the Tale:

I have had these limiters in place for a year or so now and have not had any issues. Of course, there is no way to tell if I actually have prevented a radio or multicoupler from popping, but it makes me feel better just the same.

At home right now I have an ST-2 mounted on the side of my house (a topic for an upcoming Scanner Tale). The antenna is connected to a ChannelMaster balun, this goes to an F-to-N adapter, with a 3-foot pigtail connected to a lightning arrester (grounded of course). The main coax then connects that to my office, going to the RF Limiter. This is directly connected to the multicoupler with a double-male BNC adapter, and the scanners are of course connected to the multicoupler.

Both in the car and at home I have compared reception with and without the RF Limiter in place and cannot detect any noticeable difference. While the signal strength meters on the 536’s in the car are not to be relied upon other than as a relative indicator the voice quality and reception of weaker signals do not appear to be affected. At home I have used an Icom R8600 to compare and again I cannot detect any difference with or without the device in line.

There are cheaper devices out there, others have suggested some HP devices commonly available used on eBay. I considered them but ultimately went with the Stridsberg as they are BNC-equipped, the HP’s have SMA’s and would require additional adapters or jumpers Interestingly, when I got my LIM-01WB’s I took the cover off and found they use a Mini-Circuits product as the operative device. See the picture at https://forums.radioreference.com/threads/rf-limiters.474993/post-4026163\

If you have a transmitter near your scanner or the antenna then you probably should use protection. Think of it as a prophylactic for your radios; you will never know if it prevented something bad but it can make you feel better about your life choices.
 

W9WSS

Retired LEO
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,131
Location
Westmont, DuPage County, IL USA
Is there any truth to the story that you can "desensitize" a scanner or other communications receiver with a nearby transmitter even if the scanner or receiver is turned off? Or does the scanner or receiver have to be powered and turned on?
 

N9JIG

Sheriff
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
6,188
Location
Far NW Valley
Is there any truth to the story that you can "desensitize" a scanner or other communications receiver with a nearby transmitter even if the scanner or receiver is turned off? Or does the scanner or receiver have to be powered and turned on?
I would think that you could pop a protection diode with the radio on or off, the antenna port does not get physically disconnected when you turn off the radio.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,509
Location
United States
Is there any truth to the story that you can "desensitize" a scanner or other communications receiver with a nearby transmitter even if the scanner or receiver is turned off? Or does the scanner or receiver have to be powered and turned on?

Shutting power off does not disconnect the antenna from the soft bits in the radio.
 

IC-R20

LoBand Nation
Joined
Nov 19, 2018
Messages
633
I stopped doing most any transmitting at all now starting in 2017 as I got paranoid about this as well. I never heard any pop on my BCT15x and the reception seems the same so hopefully I got lucky, I assume reception would be a dramatic difference all at once instead of gradual similar to when you blow an FET on a shortwave portable. I had it really close to a 110 watt 10 meter radio I used sometimes and frequently with the original 75 watt 2900r Yaesu on 2 meters. I had closecall on one time for only the 800mhz band thinking I would be safe and nearly blew everyone's eardrums out on the local repeater when the scanner unsquelched while I was talking.
 

kc8jwt

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 25, 2011
Messages
57
Location
Belpre, OH
Years ago I had my mobile radio in the car and also my scanner. When I purchased a new 2M/440 rig for the car, I bought a Kenwood TM-V7A. I went ahead and programmed the local law enforcement, fire and EMS on the 440 side as at the time we didn't have any 440 repeaters and then I would scan on the 440 side while I could transmit and talk on the 2M side. Before that, there were a few times in the car that the scanner would go nuts as I had to run a higher power due to the fact of the terrain I lived in was pretty hilly so you had to have some power to get up over the hills. With the Kenwood, I rarely turned the scanner on in the car since I had everything in the Kenwood. And with the independent volume it was nice to be able to turn it down when you were on 2M and there was a lot going on with fire, EMS, and law enforcement.
 

Hdc30474

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 20, 2025
Messages
73
Is there any truth to the story that you can "desensitize" a scanner or other communications receiver with a nearby transmitter even if the scanner or receiver is turned off? Or does the scanner or receiver have to be powered and turned on?
Densensitization is not a permanent thing. The term refers to saturating the front end with RF energy to the point that it effectively shuts down a front end transistor while the signal is present and cannot receive a signal it can process. Unless a transmitter is directly connected to the antenna input of a scanner (whether on or off), or to some part of the antenna system, it is unlikely to cause damage. Especially if there is a few feet of separation between the transmitter antenna and the scanner antenna. I have now, and have had many times past, a scanner antenna and a HAM radio transceiver with an output of up to 100 watts on HF, VHF or UHF that have been as close as each side of the hood and never had a problem. The only time I had a scanner front end damaged was a very close lightening strike on I-4 east of Orlando.
 
Last edited:

kc2asb

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
967
Location
NYC Area
Shutting power off does not disconnect the antenna from the soft bits in the radio.
Interesting point. I used to have antennas for 2m, 220, 440 and 900 plus a groundplane for the scanner on two masts that were only 3 feet or so apart. I never transmitted on any band without shutting off the other radios to prevent damage. I never realized a radio could be damaged by a nearby transmitter when it was off. Guess I got lucky! ;)
 

N9JIG

Sheriff
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
6,188
Location
Far NW Valley
There is a difference between "Desense" and damaging the radio. Desense means the sensitivity of a receiver is reduced due to overload from a nearby transmitter. That would not normally damage the receiver unless the transmitter is particularly strong and close to the receiver. It is the latter that is supposed to be protected with these RF limiters.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,509
Location
United States
Right, you need to also consider loss in the coax, coupling between antennas, what sort of filtering the radio has for out of band, etc.

There is no one answer that works for every application.
 

IC-R20

LoBand Nation
Joined
Nov 19, 2018
Messages
633
Interesting point. I used to have antennas for 2m, 220, 440 and 900 plus a groundplane for the scanner on two masts that were only 3 feet or so apart. I never transmitted on any band without shutting off the other radios to prevent damage. I never realized a radio could be damaged by a nearby transmitter when it was off. Guess I got lucky! ;)
Likewise. I also used plug in a little FM transmitter dongle into the basestation scanner so I could hear the big antenna all over the house when I used to have one. Probably have been using the case as a shunt antenna this whole time :ROFLMAO:
 
Top
OSZAR »